Injustices faced by black people in South America Essays

Injustices faced by black people in South America Essays Injustices faced by black people in South America Essay Injustices faced by black people in South America Essay Essay Topic: Black Boy I am going to use the film The Colour Purple to look at the way Steven Spielberg uses media techniques to look at the injustices faced by black people in South America in the 1930s. I will be using evidence from the film to help support my answers. The slave trade made the black people to come to America in the 17th and 18th century. But this was abolished in 1870 by the civil war which had broken out. However, what the white people had thought of the blacks did take a lot longer to change. The black people in South America in the 1930s were treated terribly, especially the women, and were given no rights. Black people werent allowed the same rights as whites and had no rights over them. Black women had no rights over men and could be abused, beaten, raped and forced to do anything the black men wanted. The film The Colour Purple is about two black sisters named Nettie and Celie. Celie was raped twice in her youth and had two babies taken away from her dad and think her dad has killed them. Then Celie to a new home with Mr. (whos name we do not know). But Mr. Prefers Nettie. Nettie then later moves in with Celie and Mr. Who then tries to rape Nettie on her way to school, but she fights back and stops him from doing so. When Nettie returns Mr. Kicks her out. She then promises to write to Celie but none of her letters reach her. Later on Celie meets Shug Avery who Mr falls in love with. When Celie grows up, Shug Avery helps Celie to find the letters when Mr went away. She then finds the letters hidden under the floor boards under a chest; she then becomes mad with Mr for hiding the letters. Celie reads all the letters, which leads up to Mr asking for a shave. This is when Celie gets the idea to slit Mrs throat, but fails when Shug stops her just in time. A few years later Celie gets t he house due to Mr dieing of old age. Celie then receives a letter from Nettie saying she is returning from Africa with Celies son and daughter. They soon return to America and end up living together. The film starts with credits written in purple on a black background with only the sound of birds fading into the background. This shows it is a serious film because there is no happy music or any sounds that relate to anything happy. The film starts and the first thing you see is a field of purple flowers on a sunny day with some happy music. The two girls are running around happy as Larry, singing and laughing and dancing through the field of tall purple flowers. Spielberg uses a crab shot to make us feel part of the film. As they come out of the field and you can see their whole body you immediately notice that something is wrong as one girl, Celie, seems to be pregnant. The dad then arrives and insults the pregnant girl by saying: Celie you have the ugliest smile this side of the equator. This shows that Celie is being treated badly and unfairly and also gives a bad impression of the dad. Suddenly the scene goes into a dramatic form from a peaceful yet powerful form. You can now see Celie on a bed screaming and crying in pain on a bed in what seems to be a barn of some sort. The background outside is a windy and all together bad weather view, which really gives the emphasis of a dramatic scene. Her sister, Nettie, is there trying to calm Celie down as she soaks a blood covered cloth in a bowl of blood red water. Then we immediately realise Celie is giving birth. The shots of the camera are a lot of close up shots to show the feeling and emotion on the characters faces. The dad then comes in and shouts: Aint you done yet? which shows he is bored of waiting. When Celie is done giving birth her dad comes in and takes the baby way gives us an even worse impression of their dad. It also makes us feel sorry for Celie going through all that pain for nothing. In the second key scene shows Celie and Nettie running around in the garden of Mr, who is reading his paper. He then looks up and blanks out Celie with his paper and watches Nettie. The scene then changes to follow Nettie down a country road with books in her hand. The audience picks up the impression that Nettie is on the way to school. Then we see Mr riding up beside her on his horse. The road then splits into two and goes around a group of trees. Nettie goes around one side and Mr going the other side. They can just see each other through the trees. The shots used by Spielberg are more crab shots so we can see the view points of each of the characters eyes. Nettie can see Mr smiling through the trees and becomes scared so walks faster, almost to a jog. She looks over again and just sees the horse with no Mr as the rider. The paths then meet up again and Mr is not on the horse or visible to Nettie. He pops out behind Nettie out of the trees laughing. He removes his hat and flower petals fall out. All these visual clues give us the impression that Nettie is going to be raped by Mr. The scene is made tenser by the silence of no music and only Mr singing to Nettie and the sound of the horse foot steps. He then grabs her, as she keeps repeating the line: I gotta go to school! Nettie is then dragged out of view into the bushes by Mr. You then her screams making the scene very dramatic. Suddenly Mr is heard shouting and it is obvious he is hurt and is in pain. The next visual of Nettie and Mr we see is Nettie running and Mr falling to the ground holding his groin. He then says: Im gonna get you. This shows a big injustice to black women and their rights in that Mr tries to rape Nettie in broad daylight. This shows us that Mr has a poor view towards women and doesnt care if he is caught. The third key scene is about whites having control over the blacks. Spielberg has started the scene with a cheery fashion with a guitarist playing in a happy town centre environment. It starts with Ms. Millie looking and complimenting Ms. Sofias children, as she kisses and hugs them. Ms. Millie cannot leave the children and starts the trouble by asking Ms. Sofia if shell be her maid as which she replies: Hell no. This builds up the tension as the people turn and look. The mayor goes up to Ms. Sofia and slaps her. Ms. Sofia becomes angry and slowly clenches her fists. As she hits him a van drives past and blocks the view of the audience building up more tension. When the van has drove past you see the mayor floored. You can tell she has obviously hit him. All the town people crowd round and start shouting abuse at Ms. Sofia. This, again, builds up tension as you want to know how she will escape the situation. The camera scans round showing the emotion on the town folks faces and finally Ms. Sofias. She then spots the sheriff and shouts for help but instead he hits her with the handle of the gun and she lies on the floor. The wind then blows her skirt up showing her underwear. This has been done as it creates humiliation and lose of dignity. The camera shot here is a birds-eye view of things making Ms. Sofia look small and helpless. The forth and final key scene is the scene in which Celie is reading the letters from Nettie she and Shug have found. This has been done to show the readings of the letters in corresponding lives. The scene is bright and sunny in different scenarios. The scene tells the story of the excitement of Netties new life in Africa. In Africa the white men are building a new road straight through the village of the black people in which Nettie is staying. The blacks dont have a say in the matter. In Netties story there has also been a tribal ritual in which children are given the scars of the tribe on their faces. The scene ends up being built into a very tense scene. Celie is being forced to give Mr a shave and is sharpening the blade on the razor. Whilst this is happening Shug is applying red nail varnish. She is also wearing red. Red has been chosen to symbolise danger. Then Mrs children run past and tell Shug, Celie is giving Mr a shave. She immediately realises the danger and runs back to the house in time to stop Celie from killing Mr. Spielberg uses the techniques well by switching between the two countries; zooming in on both the tribes childs face and Mrs neck, and also Shug sprinting to the house in time. This technique is a excellent way to build the tension, and is doubled by the help of the music becoming quicker and quicker, until contact is made on the boys face. The camera is then flicked to Mrs still face, as if he has been killed. Then the camera is pulled out in order to see Shug holding Celies arm back with the razor in her hand. In conclusion, I think Spielberg has created the drama and excitement needed to portray the injustices of black people in South America in the 1930s, by using the camera angles and music to his advantage. The injustices portrayed successfully are that of: * Women not allowed to keep their children * Women getting raped and beaten And * African countries having to suffer to the expense to white European nations. Overall Spielberg has created a very successful film by using many different camera angles and the use of music to produce the film.

Simple Élire (to Elect) French Verb Conjugations

Simple Élire (to Elect) French Verb Conjugations In French, the verb  Ãƒ ©lire  means to elect. Whenever you want to use it in the past tense elected or the future tense will elect, you will need to conjugate the verb. French students know that this can be a challenge and  Ãƒ ©lire  is one of those tricky irregular verbs. Conjugating the French Verb  Ãƒâ€°lire French verb conjugations are more complex than they are in English. Thats because the verb endings change not only with the tense of the sentence  but also with the subject pronoun. Élire  is an  irregular verb  and its similar to other words like  lire (to read), rà ©Ãƒ ©lire  (to re-elect), and relire (to re-read, replay). While this is not the most common conjugation pattern, these few words do make learning the entire group a little easier. To conjugate  Ãƒ ©lire, pair the subject pronoun with the tense. For instance, I elect is jà ©lis while we will elect is nous à ©lirons. Practice each of these in context to learn how to use them in your French conversations. Subject Present Future Imperfect j lis lirai lisais tu lis liras lisais il lit lira lisait nous lisons lirons lisions vous lisez lirez lisiez ils lisent liront lisaient The Present Participle of  Ãƒâ€°lire The  present participle  is another verb form that you should know. To form it, add -ant  to the verb stem to produce  Ãƒ ©lisant. Beyond using it as a verb, you will also find it helpful as an adjective, gerund, or noun in some circumstances. The Past Participle and Passà © Composà © For the past tense of  Ãƒ ©lire, you can choose either the imperfect or the  passà © composà ©. To construct the latter, begin with the subject pronoun and conjugate the  auxiliary verb  avoir  to match it. Then, attach the  past participle  Ãƒ ©lu. The passà © composà © comes together quickly: I have elected is jai à ©lu and we elected is nous avons à ©lu. More Simple Élire  Conjugations Among other simple conjugations of  Ãƒ ©lire  that French students should know are the following. You may not use them often, but they can be quite handy to know. In rare instances, and primarily when reading or writing, you may see  the passà © simple or the imperfect subjunctive. More frequently, the subjunctive and conditional verb moods are used. Each implies no guarantee to the verbs action in some form or fashion. Subject Subjunctive Conditional Pass Simple Imperfect Subjunctive j lise lirais lus lusse tu lises lirais lus lusses il lise lirait lut lt nous lisions lirions lmes lussions vous lisiez liriez ltes lussiez ils lisent liraient lurent lussent To use  Ãƒ ©lire  in exclamations, demands, and short requests, use the imperative form. When doing so, skip the subject pronoun and use à ©lis rather than tu à ©lis. Imperative (tu) lis (nous) lisons (vous) lisez

Educational Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 250 words

Educational - Essay Example Re-design the space to â€Å"provide effective restoration breaks and allow them to return to their work cognitively refreshed†. Today I am discussing on the design redesigning proposal of one of the buildings at the Cities Hall. This is a compute room located within the area. The room needs to be redesigned in respect to the addresses of the students in the educational environment by adhering to the being away, extent, Fascination and compatibility properties in architecture. Since the students have a lot to do at the college, they need refreshment and the computer room will be one of the best places. This is because the room has got computers for the students to be using while resting. It is also one of the best places the students like to hang out at. When redesigning the room, the first thing to do is conceptualize the room fully and perform some testing assumptions. This will go hand in hand with the evaluation of the results then followed by refining the craft of the building. This will begin with the viewing of the placement by redesigning the building by leaving enough spaces for the students to have good indoor and outdoor movements. This includes leaving enough spaces in the building. The design will focus on the properties of Address which entails Being away, Extend, and compatibility. Being away entails a new routine to be used by the students. The extent entails designing the room in order to follow the coherence needed and make the students be familiar with the building. Compatibility will abide with the students’ requirement by fitting and supporting the students. Example is having a place for the students to put their luggages. Under the indoor and outdoor view plan, the design will be well analyzed by the interactions of the students and locating their specific locations likes. Testing of the results will be done by the use of ANOVA testing. The indoor and outdoor of the room will be well analyzed and

Would Islamic finance have prevented the current global financial Essay

Would Islamic finance have prevented the current global financial crisis Discuss - Essay Example The Islamic financial markets appears to have greater discipline and risk-sharing and conceivably can provide a solution or safeguard against the risk of financial crises.3 This research study analyzes the possibility that a world financial system modeled after Islamic financial systems may have prevented the current financial global crisis. It is concluded that some aspects of the Islamic financial markets system may have functioned to minimize the current global financial crisis, but it could not have prevented the crisis altogether. This is because some features of conventional financial systems are necessary for preserving and servicing conventional financial needs and competition, particularly the interests rates attributed to mortgages. This paper is therefore divided into four sections. The first section analyzes the causes of the financial crisis of 2008-2009. The second part of this paper analyzes the key aspects of Islamic financial markets regulations and ideologies. The s econd part of this paper also identifies and strengths and weaknesses of Islamic financial systems. The third part of this paper analyzes the feasibility of Islamic financial systems as a solution to or safeguard against financial crises. The final part of this paper offers concluding remarks and observations. Contents Abstract 2 Contents 3 Introduction 4 The Causes of the Global Financial Crisis 2008-2009

Hesiod’s Theogony :: Hesiod’s Theogony

Hesiod’s Theogony Hesiod writes his Theogony within the context of the nascent polis, which informs his conception of the Greek pantheon. The generations of gods that he portrays begin with the elements of nature and move steadily toward fully anthropomorphic figures, which represent elements corresponding to the experience of the city-state. In Hesiod’s time, the polis was led by a king, or kings, and the rule of Zeus that Hesiod portrays serves as an example of royal rule for them. Toward the end of the Theogony Zeus is urged by the other gods to be king, to rule the other immortals, and to follow the advice of Gaia. And so he apportions honors among them (881-5). Hesiod suggests that royal power results from the assent of the ruled, that it entails the right to rule, but that that rule must be tempered by recognition of the significance of nature, earth, which provides society’s livelihood. Zeus swallows the goddess Metis (890), just as a king must gain intelligence. Then he marries Themis, right, who bears good rule (Eunomia), justice (Dike) and peace (Eirene) (901-2), all necessary elements for a prosperous city-state. Eurynome (straight law) bears him the Graces (Charites), which are necessary elements for trade and social interaction. Zeus’ marriages to Demeter, Leto and Hera yield the gods and goddeses familiar to the Greek world, Persephone, Apollo, Artemis, Hebe, Ares and Eileithyia, and he himself eventually bears Athena (912-24). These are not elements of good rule, but simply the gods of the Greek polis. Demeter and Persephone are worshipped for agriculture, Apollo for his oracular shrine, Artemis for the wilderness and young women, Ares for war. Poseidon as sea god is apart from the polis, but he sires the fearsome Triton (931). Likewise, Ares’ children Phobos and Deimos, two aspects of fear, delineate realms beyond the proper bounds of the polis. Maia bears for Zeus Hermes (938-9), who as herald of the gods moves between realms, between one polis and another. The story of succession that arrives at the rule of Zeus moves from the undifferentiated Sky (Ouranos), through Kronos to Zeus, who himself must withstand the challenges of both Prometheus and Typhoeus.

Argument Against Gun Control Essay

Final Paper: Argument Against Gun Control The argument on firearm regulation has been a heated discussion for many years. On one side of the debate, we have people in favor placing restrictions on guns, while, on the opposite end of the spectrum, we have people fighting the regulation of guns. People in favor gun restrictions believe gun control can reduce crime ,while, the people against gun control believe having the right to bear arms is an effective crime deterrent. I believe that every law abiding citizen should be able to carry a gun and defend themselves against people who intend to harm them.Gun control laws are simply ineffective and they have an adverse effect on crime. Instead of reducing crime, gun control laws just simply take guns out the hands of good people and puts the guns into the hands of the bad guys. Gun control laws do not deter criminals from possessing firearms. Whether or not there’s a law restricting gun use, criminal will always find a way to get a gun because criminals are less likely to obey laws. That’s why they are called â€Å"criminals†. Also there’s no law that can stop the supply and demand of the illegal arms trade. If there’s money to be made in the black market, someone will profit from it. Criminals can easily obtain a gun through the black market. An unnamed felon was quoted, â€Å"There’s guns everywhere. If you got the money you, can get a gun.† If a criminal wanted to get a gun,they are not likely to walk into a store to buy one. Therefore, they could care less whether they had a background check or not. No law can stop criminals from arming themselves to protect themselves. Most criminals have lots of enemies and they rather get caught with a gun than get caught without one. (Stossel). The more gun control rules and regulations there are, the happier the criminals will be, for they know the more gun laws there are the less chance they have of having a crime victim defend themselves with a lawfully-owned  firearm. In many right to carry states, crime statistics are lower than the states with gun laws. The reason why is because guns are used more defensively than criminally. Criminals are usually rolling the dice when they are targeting law abiding citizens in right to carry states. (Polsby) Criminals do not fear the police or other authorities. What they fear most is the citizens who might be potentially armed. It makes it harder for criminals because they do not know what to expect from them if they’re planning to rob them. They’re either fortunate to have an unarmed victim or they become a victim with a citizen that is ready to shoot and defend their families. (Stossel). Gun control laws only affect the citizens who follow the law. The law does not apply to the criminals. Regardless if theres a gun ban or not, criminals will find a way to obtain guns. The gun laws have no way in curtailing the illegal arms trade. In Chicago, handguns are not for sale legally. Only shotguns, rifles and ammunition can be bought with people with a Firearm Owners Identification Card. The Chicago area is one of the most difficult places to legally obtain a gun. In order to get a gun license, people have to go through a background check and wait up to a month to legally carry a weapon.(Polsby). While it is difficult to legally possess a gun, it is way more easier to illegally carry a gun in Chicago. There are thousands of unregistered firearms in the streets with thousands more coming in every month. Banning the sale handguns in Chicago makes no difference as well too. People can go elsewhere to buy a gun. They can go out of town or even out of state to buy a gun with Indiana and Wisconsin in close proximity.(Moorhouse and Warner). Another example why gun control law are ineffective is the staggering increase in crime in England since they imposed a ban on guns. In 1997, England passed a ban on all guns, which makes it illegal for all citizens to carry guns. England’s gun sanctions made it one of the most strictest law in the world. The new law only created an illusion of the country being more safer. Instead of reducing crime, the law put it’s citizens at the mercy of criminals who are well assured that their would be victims are unarmed and defenseless. In the two years after the law was enacted, gun related crimes  increased to 40% and armed robberies rose to 53%. From 1997 to 2001, violent crimes more than doubled. People are six times more likely to be robbed at gunpoint in London compared to New York. In the United States, the occurrence of home burglaries is 13% because the majority of burglars fear armed homeowners more than they fear the law. England’s burglary statistics are 5 t imes higher compared to the United States at 55%. England’s gun ban created the unintended consequences of lawlessness in the streets, as well as, it did not stop criminals from possessing guns and committing crimes. (Malcolm) Even in the United states where states and cities that passed strict gun laws have found them to be ineffective. The places where gun control laws are the most strictest are places that have the most crimes are committed with firearms.(Piquero). Of the 15 states that have the highest homicide rates, 10 have very restrictive gun laws. New York, for example, has one of the most restrictive gun laws in the nation has 20 percent of the nations total of armed robberies. Another example, Washington D.C., since guns were banned in 1976 the murder rate has risen 200 percent. In Chicago, the city consistently had one of the highest homicide rates in the nation since they enacted a ban on gun in 1982. In May 2010, a month before the Supreme Court overturned the ban, Chicago already had 113 homicides for the year.(Piquero). Since gun restriction laws were repealed by the Supreme court in 2010, Chicago and Washington D.C. received significantly lower crime rates. The murder rate in Chicago in the first six months of 2011 is 14% lower than the first six months of 2010. This is the first significant drop in the murder rate since gun sanctions were first passed in 1982. In 2008, the Supreme Court lifted the gun ban in D.C. in the case of the District of Columbia vs. Heller. Since the gun ban was repealed, the murder rate in D.C. has dropped 35% from 2008-2010. The rate of assault with weapons decreased by 37% and armed robberies fell as well too by 25% (Lott). These statistics further prove how ineffective gun control laws are. Not only they do not work in reducing crime they create adverse effects on crime. Instead, they make the problems worst. I believe that the right to bear arms is an unalienable right and I don’t believe that government have that right to take it away. I feel that all citizens have the right to protect themselves and their families. Gun laws restricting the use of guns does not help law abiding citizens. These laws only take away the ability of each citizens to defend themselves and makes us helpless against criminals. Gun control only creates an illusion that a society is safer and it does not solve the root cause crime. One cannot solve the crime problem by just simply taking away guns. The crime problem goes way deeper than just guns. Criminals will find a way to get guns regardless if theres a strict law or not . Most criminals are opportunist and having a strict gun law only gives them the opportunity to commit more crime with less worry about that person being armed. I believe that there is other ways to fight crime, however, I don’t believe gun control is the answer to making our world a safer place.

The Deep State Theory, Defined and Explained

The seed for many tantalizing conspiracy theories, the term â€Å"deep state† in the United States implies the existence of a premeditated effort by certain federal government employees or other persons to secretly manipulate or control the government without regard for the policies of Congress or the President of the United States. Origin and History of the Deep State The concept of a deep state — also called a â€Å"state within a state† or a â€Å"shadow government† – was first used in reference to political conditions in countries like Turkey and post-Soviet Russia. During the 1950s, an influential anti-democratic coalition within the Turkish political system called the â€Å"derin devlet† – literally the â€Å"deep state† — allegedly dedicated itself to ousting communists from the new Turkish Republic founded by Mustafa Ataturk after World War I. Made up of elements within the Turkish military, security, and judiciary branches, the derin devlet worked to turn the Turkish people against its enemies by staging â€Å"false flag† attacks and planned riots. Ultimately, the derin devlet was blamed for the deaths of thousands of people. In the 1970s, former high-ranking officials of the Soviet Union, after defecting to the West, publically stated that the Soviet political police – the KGB – had operated as a deep state secretly attempting to control the Communist Party and ultimately, the Soviet government. In a 2006 symposium, Ion Mihai Pacepa, a former general in the Communist Romania secret police who defected to the United States in 1978, stated, In the Soviet Union, the KGB was a state within a state.† Pacepa went on to claim, â€Å"Now former KGB officers are running the state. They have custody of the country’s 6,000 nuclear weapons, entrusted to the KGB in the 1950s, and they now also manage the strategic oil industry renationalized by Putin.† The Deep State Theory in the United States In 2014, former congressional aide Mike Lofgren alleged the existence of a different type of deep state operating within the United States government in his essay titled â€Å"Anatomy of the Deep State.† Instead of a group comprised exclusively of government entities, Lofgren calls the deep state in the United States â€Å"a hybrid association of elements of government and parts of top-level finance and industry that is effectively able to govern the United States without reference to the consent of the governed as expressed through the formal political process.† The Deep State, wrote Lofgren, is not â€Å"a secret, conspiratorial cabal; the state within a state is hiding mostly in plain sight, and its operators mainly act in the light of day. It is not a tight-knit group and has no clear objective. Rather, it is a sprawling network, stretching across the government and into the private sector.† In some ways, Lofgren’s description of a deep state in the United States echoes parts of President Dwight Eisenhower’s 1961 farewell address, in which he warned future presidents to â€Å"guard against the acquisition of unwarranted influence, whether sought or unsought, by the military-industrial complex.† President Trump Alleges a Deep State Opposes Him Following the tumultuous 2016 presidential election, President Donald Trump and his supporters suggested that certain unnamed executive branch officials and intelligence officers were secretly operating as a deep state to block his policies and legislative agenda by leaking information considered critical of him. President Trump, White House Chief Strategist Steve Bannon, along with ultra-conservative news outlets like Breitbart News claimed that Former President Obama was orchestrating a deep state attack against the Trump administration. The allegation apparently grew out of Trump’s unsubstantiated claim that Obama had ordered the wiretapping of his telephone during the 2016 election campaign. Current and former intelligence officials remain divided on the question of the existence of a deep state secretly working to derail the Trump administration.   In a June 5, 2017 article published in The Hill Magazine, retired veteran CIA field operations agent Gene Coyle stated that while he doubted the existence of â€Å"hordes of government officials† operating as an anti-Trump deep state, he did believe the Trump administration was justified in complaining about the number of leaks being reported by news organizations. â€Å"If you are that appalled at the actions of an administration, you should quit, hold a press conference and publicly state your objections,† said Coyle. â€Å"You can’t run an executive branch if more and more people think, ‘I don’t like the policies of this president, therefore I will leak information to make him look bad.’† Other intelligence experts argued that individuals or small groups of individuals leaking information critical of a presidential administration lack the organizational coordination and depth of deep states such as those that existed in Turkey or the former Soviet Union. The Arrest of Reality Winner   On June 3, 2017, a third-party contractor working for the National Security Agency (NSA) was arrested on charges of violating the Espionage Act by leaking a top-secret document related to the possible involvement of the Russian government in the 2016 U.S. presidential election to an unnamed news organization. When questioned by the FBI on June 10, 2017, the woman, 25-year-old Reality Leigh Winner, â€Å"admitted intentionally identifying and printing the classified intelligence reporting at issue despite not having a ‘need to know,’ and with the knowledge that the intelligence report was classified,† according to the FBI affidavit. According to the Justice Department, Winner â€Å"further acknowledged that she was aware of the contents of the intelligence reporting and that she knew the contents of the reporting could be used to the injury of the United States and to the advantage of a foreign nation.† The arrest of Winner represented the first confirmed case of an attempt by a current government employee to discredit the Trump administration. As a result, many conservatives have been quick to use the case to bolster their arguments of a so-called deep state within the United States government. While its true that Winner had publicly expressed anti-Trump sentiments both to co-workers and on social media, her actions in no way prove the existence of an organized deep state effort to discredit the Trump administration.